P_SAPEA_2023 Online Practice Questions and Answers

Correct Answer: ABE

Conducting a Fit Gap Assessment (A), defining the Solution Context (B), and outlining the aspirational Solution Concept (E) align closely with the tasks of scoping and contextualizing the architecture project for SAP IBP implementation, focusing on both the technical and business aspects of the project. The Capability Assessment (C) is important but less directly related to the initial scoping and conceptualization compared to outlining the solution concept (E).

Correct Answer: A

The SAP Reference Solution Architecture typically includes a variety of diagrams to detail different aspects of the solution. The set comprising the Solution Value Flow Diagram, Solution Process Flow Diagram, Solution Component Diagram, and Solution Data Flow Diagram offers a comprehensive overview. These artifacts collectively provide insights into the flow of value, processes, components, and data in the architecture, which are key elements for understanding and detailing a solution architecture in the SAP environment.

Correct Answer: D

The Business Model Canvas is a strategic management tool that provides a comprehensive and cohesive view of the different aspects of a business model. It allows for the integration of various elements such as value proposition, cost structure, revenue streams, partners, and channels, ensuring a unified and consistent approach to the project.

Correct Answer: AD

These options correctly link the E2E Business Process of BPM with the Business Domain of BCM and the Business Activity of BPM with the Business Capability of BCM, reflecting the connection between processes and capabilities in SAP's framework.

Correct Answer: B

SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) enables the creation of extensions that can maintain the SAP user and security context, which is crucial for ensuring security and compliance in a business setting. Additionally, it allows for the utilization of S/4HANA eventing which is important for triggering actions in response to business events. Options A and C are incorrect because they only partially describe the capabilities of SAP BTP, or they misrepresent its exclusivity in providing a consistent user experience.

Correct Answer: D

The SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF) defines an Architecture Roadmap as a "high-level plan that describes the sequence of activities and deliverables required to achieve the target architecture." The roadmap should be based

on the artifacts of the previous phases of the EAF, such as the Business Strategy Map, the Solution Concept, and the Baseline Business and Solution Architecture. The first step in creating an Architecture Roadmap is to define the initiatives

that will be needed to achieve the target architecture. These initiatives should be aligned with the business outcomes that the organization is trying to achieve. The next step is to detail the business capabilities and solutions that will be

needed to support the initiatives. This will help to ensure that the roadmap is realistic and achievable. Finally, the roadmap should be created in two versions: an outcome-based roadmap and an application-specific roadmap. The outcome-

based roadmap will show how the initiatives will achieve the business outcomes. The application-specific roadmap will show how the solutions will be implemented.

By following these steps, you can create an Architecture Roadmap that will help you to achieve your organization's strategic goals.

Here are some of the benefits of creating an Architecture Roadmap:

It can help you to visualize the sequence of activities and deliverables required to achieve your goals.

It can help you to identify dependencies between activities and deliverables. It can help you to track progress and to make adjustments as needed. It can help you to communicate your plans to stakeholders. Therefore, an Architecture

Roadmap can be a valuable tool for managing complex transformations.

According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, which is a methodology and toolset by the German multinational software company SAP that helps enterprise architects define and implement an architecture strategy for their

organizations, the steps involved in creating an Architecture Roadmap are:

Reuse the artifacts of previous phases as input for creating roadmaps. The previous phases of the architecture development cycle are: architecture vision, business architecture, information systems architecture, and technology architecture.

The artifacts of these phases provide the information and guidance for defining the scope, objectives, stakeholders, requirements, constraints, and solutions of the architecture project. Some of the artifacts that can be reused for creating

roadmaps are: stakeholder map, business strategy map, solution strategy, solution context diagram, solution component diagram, solution application use- case diagram, solution value flow diagram, etc.

Start with a roadmap construction table, by defining initiatives and business outcomes, and detailing the business capabilities and solutions. A roadmap construction table is a tool that helps to structure and organize the information and

elements that are needed to create a roadmap. It consists of four columns:

initiatives, business outcomes, business capabilities, and solutions. Initiatives are the strategic actions or projects that are planned to achieve the business goals and drivers. Business outcomes are the measurable results or benefits that are

expected from implementing the initiatives. Business capabilities are the skills, resources, and competencies that are required or need to mature to support the initiatives and outcomes. Solutions are the products or services that are used or

delivered to enable the capabilities and outcomes. Create two versions of a roadmap (outcome-based and application-specific). A roadmap is a visual representation of the transition architectures that will move the organization from its current

state (baseline architecture) to its desired future state (target architecture). A roadmap shows the sequence and timing of the transition architectures, as well as the deliverables, resources, and risks associated with each transition

architecture. There are two types of roadmaps that can be created:

outcome-based and application-specific. An outcome-based roadmap focuses on the business outcomes that are achieved by implementing the transition architectures. An application-specific roadmap focuses on the solutions or applications

that are implemented or changed by the transition architectures. The other options (A, B, C) are not correct for how to present an Architecture Roadmap that addresses the business challenge because they either skip or misrepresent some of

the steps in creating an Architecture Roadmap. For example:

Option A is not correct because it does not include reusing the artifacts of previous phases as input for creating roadmaps, which is an important step to ensure alignment and consistency with the architecture project. It also suggests creating

a work breakdown structure instead of a roadmap construction table, which is not a tool in this framework.

Option B is not correct because it does not include creating two versions of a roadmap (outcome-based and application-specific), which is an important step to provide different perspectives and levels of detail for the roadmap. It also suggests

focusing on the target architecture instead of the transition architectures, which is not a logical approach since the latter determine how to achieve the former. Option C is not correct because it does not include starting with a roadmap

construction table, which is an important step to structure and organize the information and elements that are needed to create a roadmap. It also suggests focusing on the business strategy map instead of the initiatives and outcomes, which

is not a sufficient level of detail for creating a roadmap.

Correct Answer: C

According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, which is a methodology and toolset by the German multinational software company SAP that helps enterprise architects define and implement an architecture strategy for their

organizations, Transition Architectures are intermediate states between the Baseline Architecture (the current situation) and the Target Architecture (the desired future state). Transition Architectures describe how to move from one state to

another in a feasible and manageable way, taking into account the constraints and dependencies of the project. Transition Architectures are useful for structuring complex application architectures that require multiple changes of existing

interdependent applications and/or the rollout of new applications. Some applications/solutions depend on the existence of others, meaning that they cannot be implemented or operated without the presence or functionality of other

applications/solutions. For example, a new application that relies on data from an existing application, or an existing application that needs to be integrated with a new application. By creating Transition Architectures, enterprise architects can:

Define and prioritize the sequence and timing of the changes and rollouts that are needed to achieve the Target Architecture.

Identify and mitigate the risks and issues that might arise during the transition process, such as technical, operational, or organizational challenges. Communicate and align with the stakeholders and sponsors of the project, such as business

owners, users, developers, vendors, etc. Monitor and control the progress and performance of the project, and ensure that it meets the requirements and expectations of the project.

Transition Architectures are useful in the Application Architecture domain because they can help to structure complex application architectures that require multiple changes of existing interdependent applications and/or the rollout of new

applications. In some cases, it may be possible to make changes to existing applications independently of each other. However, in many cases, changes to one application will require changes to other applications. This is because

applications often depend on each other for data or functionality.

Transition Architectures can help to identify these dependencies and to plan the changes to the applications in a way that minimizes the impact on the business. They can also help to ensure that the changes are made in a consistent and

orderly fashion. The following are some of the benefits of using Transition Architectures in the Application Architecture domain:

They can help to improve the visibility of complex application architectures. They can help to identify dependencies between applications. They can help to plan the changes to applications in a way that minimizes the impact on the business.

They can help to ensure that the changes are made in a consistent and orderly fashion.

Therefore, Transition Architectures can be a valuable tool for managing complex application architectures.

Correct Answer: A

SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) is a suite of cloud-based platform- as-a-service (PaaS) offerings from SAP. BTP provides a variety of runtime environments for running applications, including:

SAP BTP, Cloud Foundry environment: This is a popular runtime environment for running Java, Node.js, and Python applications.

SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP), ABAP environment: This is a runtime environment for running ABAP applications.

SAP BTP, Kyma runtime: This is a runtime environment for running Kubernetes- based applications.

In addition to these runtime environments, BTP also provides a number of other services, such as:

Database services: BTP provides a variety of database services, including SAP HANA, MySQL, and PostgreSQL.

Messaging services: BTP provides a variety of messaging services, such as SAP Cloud Platform Integration and SAP Cloud Platform Event Mesh. Storage services: BTP provides a variety of storage services, such as SAP Cloud Platform

Object Storage and SAP Cloud Platform File Storage. BTP is a comprehensive platform that provides a variety of services for running applications and managing data. The different runtime environments available in BTP allow you to choose

the right environment for your specific needs.

SAP BTP supports multiple runtime environments for different purposes and skill sets. A runtime environment is any runtime that hosts applications and services. An SAP BTP environment provides integration into the SAP BTP account

model, cockpit, and permissions management10. The following are the runtime environments that SAP directly supports on SAP BTP:

SAP BTP, Cloud Foundry environment: This environment allows you to create polyglot cloud applications in Cloud Foundry. It supports various programming languages, such as Java, Node.js, Python, Go, and PHP. It also provides a code-tocontainer packaging and deployment model, platform-managed application security patching and updates, automatic application routing, load balancing, health checks, and multilevel self-healing. It also supports the Cloud Application

Programming Model (CAP), which is an opinionated framework for developing business applications.

SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP), ABAP environment: This environment allows you to create ABAP-based cloud applications within the Cloud Foundry environment. It supports the ABAP programming language and the ABAP

RESTful Programming Model (RAP), which is a framework for developing RESTful services and user interfaces. It also provides an integrated development lifecycle and enables you to reuse existing on-premise ABAP assets.

SAP BTP, Kyma runtime: This environment provides a fully managed cloud-native Kubernetes application runtime based on the open-source project "Kyma". It supports various programming languages and models, such as Node.js, Python,

Go, Java, CAP, and serverless functions. It also provides a built-in service mesh, eventing framework, API gateway, service catalog, and service binding capabilities. It enables you to develop highly scalable, microservice-based applications

and user-centric process extensions. Verified References: 10: https://help.sap.com/docs/btp/architecture-and-development- guide-for-industry-cloud-solutions/runtimes-environments-and-programming-models | :

https://help.sap.com/docs/btp/sap-business-technology-platform/environments

Correct Answer: A

SAP Cloud Application Programming (CAP) is a programming model that allows ABAP developers to build extensions to SAP applications that follow the clean-core strategy. CAP provides a number of features that make it easy to build

extensions that are stable, maintainable, and flexible.

Here are some of the features of CAP that make it a good choice for building extensions that follow the clean-core strategy:

Side-by-side extensibility: CAP extensions are deployed in the side-by-side layer, which means that they do not modify the core application. This makes CAP extensions more stable and maintainable than extensions that are embedded in the

core application.

Open interfaces: CAP extensions expose their functionality through open interfaces. This makes it easy to integrate CAP extensions with other applications and services.

Cloud-based: CAP extensions are deployed in the cloud. This makes it easy to develop, deploy, and manage CAP extensions.

Therefore, SAP Cloud Application Programming (CAP) is a good choice for ABAP developers who want to build extensions to SAP applications that follow the clean-core strategy.

The other two options, SAP Classic Extensibility model and RESTful Application Programming (RAP), are not as good of a choice for building extensions that follow the clean-core strategy.

SAP Classic Extensibility model: The SAP Classic Extensibility model allows developers to modify the core application. This makes SAP Classic Extensibility extensions less stable and maintainable than CAP extensions. RESTful Application

Programming (RAP): RAP is a programming model that is used to build RESTful APIs. RESTful APIs are not a good fit for building extensions to SAP applications because they do not provide the same level of integration as CAP extensions.

Correct Answer:

Goal - Increase supply reliability of Lithium batteries Value Driver - Halve dependence on external battery suppliers from 50% to 25% Business Capability